Woska v. Murray
442 N.E.2d 1272, 57 N.Y.2d 928, 456 N.Y.S.2d 761, 1982 N.Y. LEXIS 3801
Opinion
[929] OPINION OF THE COURT
On review of submissions pursuant to rule 500.2 (b) of the Rules of the Court of Appeals (22 NYCRR 500.2 [g]), order affirmed, with costs. The adequacy of a verdict is beyond the province of this court to review (Zipprich v Smith Trucking Co., 2 NY2d 177).
Concur: Chief Judge Cooke and Judges Jasen, Gabrielli, Jones, Wachtler, Fuchsberg and Meyer.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Woska v. Murray, 442 N.E.2d 1272, 57 N.Y.2d 928, 456 N.Y.S.2d 761, 1982 N.Y. LEXIS 3801 (N.Y. 1982).
442 N.E.2d 1272 (Woska v. Murray) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Zipprich v. Smith Trucking Co.
139 N.E.2d 146 (New York Court of Appeals, 1956)