Woska v. Murray
442 N.E.2d 1272, 57 N.Y.2d 928, 456 N.Y.S.2d 761, 1982 N.Y. LEXIS 3801
This text of 442 N.E.2d 1272 (Woska v. Murray) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Woska v. Murray, 442 N.E.2d 1272, 57 N.Y.2d 928, 456 N.Y.S.2d 761, 1982 N.Y. LEXIS 3801 (N.Y. 1982).
Opinion
[929]*929OPINION OF THE COURT
On review of submissions pursuant to rule 500.2 (b) of the Rules of the Court of Appeals (22 NYCRR 500.2 [g]), order affirmed, with costs. The adequacy of a verdict is beyond the province of this court to review (Zipprich v Smith Trucking Co., 2 NY2d 177).
Concur: Chief Judge Cooke and Judges Jasen, Gabrielli, Jones, Wachtler, Fuchsberg and Meyer.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Zipprich v. Smith Trucking Co.
139 N.E.2d 146 (New York Court of Appeals, 1956)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
442 N.E.2d 1272, 57 N.Y.2d 928, 456 N.Y.S.2d 761, 1982 N.Y. LEXIS 3801, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/woska-v-murray-ny-1982.