Home/District Court of Appeal of Florida/Worthy v. State

Worthy v. State

831 So. 2d 818, 2002 Fla. App. LEXIS 18140, 2002 WL 31757271
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedDecember 11, 2002
DocketNo. 4D02-4047
StatusPublished

This text of 831 So. 2d 818 (Worthy v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Worthy v. State, 831 So. 2d 818, 2002 Fla. App. LEXIS 18140, 2002 WL 31757271 (Fla. Ct. App. 2002).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Amy Worthy appeals the summary denial of her motion under Rule 3.850, Florida Rules of Criminal Procedure. Worthy alleged that defense counsel affirmatively mislead her with regard to the forfeiture of gain time, and that she relied on the misadvice when she entered her plea. The record before this court supports Worthy’s claim.

Consequently, we reverse the order that summarily denied relief and remand for the trial court to conduct an evidentiary hearing or to attach documents to refute the claim. State v. Leroux, 689 So.2d 235 (Fla.1996); Dellahoy v. State, 816 So.2d 1253 (Fla. 5th DCA 2002); Brazeail v. State, 821 So.2d 364 (Fla. 1st DCA 2002).

STEVENSON, HAZOURI and MAY, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Brazeail v. State
821 So. 2d 364 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2002)
State v. Leroux
689 So. 2d 235 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1996)
Dellahoy v. State
816 So. 2d 1253 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2002)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
831 So. 2d 818, 2002 Fla. App. LEXIS 18140, 2002 WL 31757271, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/worthy-v-state-fladistctapp-2002.