WORTHY v. KENDALL
This text of WORTHY v. KENDALL (WORTHY v. KENDALL) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court, M.D. Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF GEORGIA MACON DIVISION CORINE E. WORTHY, Plaintiff, v. CIVIL ACTION NO. 5:24-cv-00016-TES GARY ASHWORTH, Acting Secretary of the United States Air Force,1 Defendant.
ORDER GRANTING MOTION TO AMEND
Before the Court is pro se Plaintiff Corine E. Worthy’s Motion to Amend [Doc. 19] her Complaint. Plaintiff filed this Motion on April 28, 2025—exactly 21 days after Defendant filed and served a Rule 12(b) Motion to Dismiss [Doc. 16]. Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 15 permits a party to “amend its pleading once as a matter of course” within 21 days after a Rule 12(b) motion is served. Fed. R. Civ. P. 15(a)(1). Because Plaintiff acted within that window, she could have simply filed the amended complaint. See id.; Fed. R. Civ. P. 6(a)(1). However, because Plaintiff sought leave to amend, the Court GRANTS her Motion [Doc. 19] and ORDERS Plaintiff to file an amended complaint—together with
1 Because Plaintiff raises claims against the Secretary of the United States Air Force (USAF) in his official capacity, Gary Ashworth, Acting Secretary of the USAF, is substituted for Frank Kendall, former Secretary of the USAF. Fed. R. Civ. P. 25(d). any exhibits she wishes for the Court to consider—within ten days of this Order.2 Additionally, because the amended complaint will supersede the original Complaint,
see Lowery v. Ala. Power Co., 483 F.3d 1184, 1219 (11th Cir. 2007), the Court DENIES Defendant’s Motion to Dismiss [Doc. 16] as moot. SO ORDERED, this 2nd day of May, 2025.
S/ Tilman E. Self, III TILMAN E. SELF, III, JUDGE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
2 To be clear, in light of this amendment, the original Complaint and all accompanying exhibits are deemed abandoned. See [Doc. 1]. If Plaintiff wishes to rely on any exhibits, she must file or refile them with her amended complaint.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
WORTHY v. KENDALL, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/worthy-v-kendall-gamd-2025.