Worthy v. Commissioners

76 U.S. 611, 19 L. Ed. 565, 9 Wall. 611, 1869 U.S. LEXIS 1006
CourtSupreme Court of the United States
DecidedFebruary 18, 1870
StatusPublished
Cited by2 cases

This text of 76 U.S. 611 (Worthy v. Commissioners) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of the United States primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Worthy v. Commissioners, 76 U.S. 611, 19 L. Ed. 565, 9 Wall. 611, 1869 U.S. LEXIS 1006 (1870).

Opinion

The CHIEF JUSTICE

delivered the opinion of the court.

It is manifest that this court has no jurisdiction of the present cause. There was no decision by the Supreme Court of North Carolina against the validity of any treaty or act of Congress, or authority exercised under the United States; nor in favor of the validity of a statute of, or authority exercised under a State, and alleged to be repugnant to the Constitution, treaties, or laws of the United States.

It is true that, in the brief of the counsel for the plaintiff, it is urged that the right of the plaintiff is protected by the 1st section of the 14th amendment; but this right does not appear to have been set up, or specially claimed in the State court; and this is essential to jurisdiction here.

We have no authority, therefore, to examine the question presented by the record; but must allow the motion of the defendants in error, and dismiss the cause for

Want oe jurisdiction.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Anderson v. Griswold
2023 CO 63 (Supreme Court of Colorado, 2023)
Amey v. Cockey
20 A. 1071 (Court of Appeals of Maryland, 1891)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
76 U.S. 611, 19 L. Ed. 565, 9 Wall. 611, 1869 U.S. LEXIS 1006, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/worthy-v-commissioners-scotus-1870.