Worthy v. Clapp
This text of 99 Mass. 561 (Worthy v. Clapp) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
The promissory note made to Mrs. Clapp, by a partnership of which her husband was not a member, in consideration of a sale by him of the interests of himself and his firm in another partnership, the pecuniary capital of which is to be taken upon the answers of the trustees to have been furnished by her, was, under the existing statutes of the Commonwealth, her separate property, and, in the absence of fraud, could not be attached, by trustee process or otherwise, against her husband. Gen. Sts. c. 108, § 1. Chapman v. Williams, 13 Gray, 416. Lora v. Davison, 3 Allen, 131. Ames v. Foster, Ib. 541.
Trustees discharged.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
99 Mass. 561, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/worthy-v-clapp-mass-1868.