Worthington v. Plainfield Board of Education

40 A.2d 9, 23 N.J. Misc. 14, 1944 N.J. Misc. LEXIS 43
CourtNew Jersey Department of Labor Workmen's Compensation Bureau
DecidedNovember 22, 1944
StatusPublished
Cited by4 cases

This text of 40 A.2d 9 (Worthington v. Plainfield Board of Education) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New Jersey Department of Labor Workmen's Compensation Bureau primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Worthington v. Plainfield Board of Education, 40 A.2d 9, 23 N.J. Misc. 14, 1944 N.J. Misc. LEXIS 43 (N.J. Super. Ct. 1944).

Opinion

A petition was filed in this matter, alleging an injury arising out of and in the course of the employment of petitioner as a school teacher for the Board of Education of the City of Plainfield. Respondent filed an answer specifically denying that the injury arose out of and in the course of the employment of petitioner as a school teacher of the City of Plainfield.

The matter came on before me at Newark, November 3d, 1944, at which time counsel for petitioner and respondent presented to me a written stipulation of all of the faets con-[15]*15corning the injury to petitioner. The said stipulation provided as follows: ;

“Petitioner in this case was on March 30th, 1943, em-1' ployed as a teacher in the home economics department of the, Plainfield school system, earning $3,000 yearly. On that1' day she was worM-ng at Evergreen School, which was in charge of Mr. Davis, principal. In connection with a war-loan drive, permission was granted by Mr. Davis for the United States Army to put on a demonstration of tire uses of a jeep. The following notice was posted on the school bulletin board announcing the demonstration:

March 30th, 1943.
’’Was Savings Song Tune: Parmer in the Dell.
We’U. buy our stamps to day,
>We’ll buy our stamps today,
Heigho-—-America,
We’ll bay our stamps today.
It’s Liberty for Aye!
It’s Liberty for Aye!
Heigho—America'
We’ll bay our stamps today.
“Buy more and more War Stamps. Everyone should do this. It is the object of the Junior Eed Cross Council to try to encourage the buying of more stamps. We would lifee to be able to buy a Jeep with our stamp sales To do this everyone must buy more stamps.
“Today a Jeep from Camp Kilmer will be on exhibit on the playground. The schedule for classes is below:
6p — 9 :30 3j —10:12 5 —10:43
Kg — 9:36 4f —10:18 5D —10:54
1Z — 9:43 4b —10:34 6H —11:00
1 S— 9:48 6A —10:30 8C —11:06
2o — 9:54 7 R—10:36 8B —11:12
2K —10:00 7 N—10 :43 7G- —11:18
3N —10:00
ITo Junior Assembly today.

[16]*16“In connection with, the demonstration, the sergeant in charge of the jeep brought logs and wood and a wooden ramp or obstacle was constructed in the yard of the school. The jeep was to be driven up this ramp, which was built to a height of a foot or more off the ground ending abruptly so that after ascending the ramp the jeep had a dr-op of a foot or more back to the ground.

“Petitioner in response to said notice appeared with her class in the school yard at 11:15 a. m. and at the invitation of the driver of the jeep entered it together with another teacher and a number of children. They were driven around the school yard dodging trees and then np the ramp and off the abrupt end of same. The jeep at this time contained petitioner, another teacher and a large number of children, some of tire latter being required to stand. While riding over the obstacle petitioner was holding onto a grip on the side of the jeep with her right hand and was helping to steady a child standing in front of her with her left hand. When the jeep dropped off the abrupt end of the obstacle she was bounced from her seat but clung with her right hand to the grip on the side o-f the jeep and as a result of the strain thus thrown on her right hand and arm she is alleged to have injured her right arm, shoulder and back.

“It is also stipulated that if Mr. Davis, principal of the school, were called he would state that he was present during part of the demonstration and that he gave no directions either for or against teachers and pupils riding in the jeep. Mr. Davis would also testify that prior to the time he learned that the petitioner rode in the jeep that he had seen some pupils ride in the jeep and then left tile demonstration to attend, to some other duties.

“it is also stipulated that if Mr. Hopper were called he would testify that he is the director of the Industrial and Tine Arts Department and the petitioner’s superior; that he knew nothing about the demonstration until the petitioner some time in June, 1943, came to him and asked if he could do something about getting her compensation for this accident. He advised her all he could do was to report the matter to Mr. Zimmer, Secretary of the Board of Education, which he did.

[17]*17“It is also stipulated that if Mr. Zimmer were called he would testify that he is the Secretary of the Board of Education of Plainfield and on March 9th, 1943, ike following resolution was adopted by the Board of Education:

“Besolved, that the work of the employees of the Board | of Education relating to any war effort constitutes a paast1 of the voluntary or required school program of the Plainfield' School District.

“St is farther agreed that he would also testify that the Board of Education did not sponsor the demonstration and-knew nothing about it until he was told by Mr. Hopper on June kith, 1943.”

After due consideration of the above stipulated facts I do find that the injuries sustained by petitioner on March 30th, 1943, while she was riding in the jeep, as aforesaid, arose out of and in the course of her employment. The injuries in question occurred on the school property and while petitioner was actually engaged in an activity that was at least sponsored by the Evergreen School at which she was working, if not by a formal approval of the Board of Education itself. It is a fact from the stipulation that there were school children in this jeep, that petitioner was actually in the jeep with the children and was even helping to steady or support one of them in the crowded vehicle. Her presence in the jeep was, therefore, clearly within the scope of her duties and it might even be said that she was required to be there due to the presence of the children, who undoubtedly required supervision under the circara-sfanees. I, therefore, find as a matter of fact that petitioner’s injuries on March 30th, 1943, arose out of and in the course of her employment within the meaning of our Workmen's Compensation Act, N. J. S. A. 34 :15—1, &t seq. On the question of disability, petitioner testified that she lacked strength in her arm and hand and has great difficulty in raising her arm because of pain in the upper arm and shoulder. She stated that this pain particularly affects her in hor work when she has to reach up to write on a blackboard.

Doctor Max Hummel, who examined the petitioner on December 18th, 1M3, testified that there was slight restrie[18]*18tion of forward flexion and abduction, some restriction of external rotation and on internal rotation considerable restrietion. His diagnosis was sub-pluxation of the acromioclavicular joint with a frozen shoulder. He stated that at the time of his examination he found an existing disability of 12%.% of total.

On behalf of respondent a report of Dr. Otis P.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

James v. Board of Trustees
732 A.2d 517 (New Jersey Superior Court App Division, 1999)
Outland v. Monmouth-Ocean Education Service Commission
713 A.2d 460 (Supreme Court of New Jersey, 1998)
Electronic Associates, Inc. v. Heisinger
266 A.2d 601 (New Jersey Superior Court App Division, 1970)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
40 A.2d 9, 23 N.J. Misc. 14, 1944 N.J. Misc. LEXIS 43, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/worthington-v-plainfield-board-of-education-njlaborcomp-1944.