Worthington v. Dutch Decorative Art Co.

Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York

Worthington v. Dutch Decorative Art Co.

84 N.Y.S. 1151

CourtAppellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York

DecidedNovember 18, 1903

StatusPublished

This text of 84 N.Y.S. 1151 (Worthington v. Dutch Decorative Art Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Worthington v. Dutch Decorative Art Co., 84 N.Y.S. 1151 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1903).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

The evidence established the plaintiff’s acquiescence in the reduction of his salary subsequent to January 10, 1903, and the judgment should be reduced by $60, representing 12 weeks’ work at $5 per week; that sum being the difference between the original rate of $25 and the reduced rate of $20. The judgment should be modified by reducing it to $130.87, and, as so modified, affirmed, without costs of this appeal. Judgment modified by reducing amount of recovery to the sum of $130.87, and, as modified, affirmed, without costs of this appeal to either party.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

The evidence established the plaintiff’s acquiescence in the reduction of his salary subsequent to January 10, 1903, and the judgment should be reduced by $60, representing 12 weeks’ work at $5 per week; that sum being the difference between the original rate of $25 and the reduced rate of $20. The judgment should be modified by reducing it to $130.87, and, as so modified, affirmed, without costs of this appeal. Judgment modified by reducing amount of recovery to the sum of $130.87, and, as modified, affirmed, without costs of this appeal to either party.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

84 N.Y.S. 1151, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/worthington-v-dutch-decorative-art-co-nyappterm-1903.