Worthington Pump & MacHinery Corp. v. Court of Common Pleas
This text of 44 A.2d 652 (Worthington Pump & MacHinery Corp. v. Court of Common Pleas) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of New Jersey primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
The opinion of the court was delivered by
The Bureau dismissed a petition for compensation. The Court of Common Pleas reversed, relying upon Mandel v. Federal Shipbuilding and Drydock, 132 N. J. L. 513; reversed, 133 Id. 311.
In September of 1943, the workman complained of a pain "in his right lower groin. The plant physician found that there was no evidence of a hernia at that time. He complained again on November 22d and November 30th, 1943, with the same result. He sought no outside medical aid till December 8th, 1943.
The statute R. S. 34:15-12 (x) provides for recovery in two instances. • The case does not fall within the first division and the second was not complied with. Primo v. Austin Co., 121 N. J. L. 518; Mandel v. Federal Shipbuilding and Drydock Co., supra.
The proofs being in balance do not sustain the contention that there may have been an accident which aggravated a pre *413 existing diseased condition. Furferi v. Pennsylvania Rail road,, 117 N. J. L. 508. The evidence was that after the alleged strain from swinging the hammer the five essentials of the statute did not occur. There must be conclusive proof thereof.
The judgment of the Court of Common Pleas will be reversed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
44 A.2d 652, 133 N.J.L. 412, 1945 N.J. Sup. Ct. LEXIS 57, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/worthington-pump-machinery-corp-v-court-of-common-pleas-nj-1945.