Worthington Corp. v. Mlodozeniec

364 U.S. 628, 81 S. Ct. 356
Supreme Court of the United States·Decided January 9, 1961·No. 515·Published·Cited by 5 cases

Opinion

Per Curiam.

The motion to dismiss is granted and the appeal is dismissed. Treating the papers whereon the appeal was taken as a petition for writ of certiorari, certiorari is denied.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Worthington Corp. v. Mlodozeniec, 364 U.S. 628, 81 S. Ct. 356 (1961).

364 U.S. 628 (Worthington Corp. v. Mlodozeniec) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Claim of Thomas v. Bethlehem Steel Corp.
470 N.E.2d 831 (New York Court of Appeals, 1984)
In re the Estate of Deitch
106 Misc. 2d 690 (New York Surrogate's Court, 1981)
Becker v. Huss Co.
373 N.E.2d 1205 (New York Court of Appeals, 1978)
Thompson v. Lincoln Budget Corp.
89 Misc. 2d 252 (New York Supreme Court, 1976)
Greenough v. Deblinger
84 Misc. 2d 463 (Civil Court of the City of New York, 1975)