Worthen v. State

1986 OK CR 24, 715 P.2d 81, 1986 Okla. Crim. App. LEXIS 212
Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma·Decided February 14, 1986·No. No. F-83-680·Published·Cited by 4 cases

Opinion

ORDER REVERSING CONVICTION AND REMANDING FOR NEW TRIAL

Appellant, John Michael Worthen, was convicted in Comache County District Court, Case No. CRF-88-220, of Distribution of Marijuana, After Former Conviction of Two or More Felonies, in which he received a sentence of eighteen years’ imprisonment and a fine of seven thousand five hundred dollars ($7,500). Since this case must be reversed and remanded, we deem it unnecessary to set forth the facts.

Appellant was represented at trial by court appointed counsel, who had previously served as assistant district attorney and successfully convicted appellant in the two former convictions which were used for enhancement of punishment.

The United States Supreme Court held in Cuyler v. Sullivan, 446 U.S. 335, 100 S.Ct. 1708, 1717, 64 L.Ed.2d 333 (1976), that a defense counsel has an ethical obligation to avoid conflicting representations and to advise the court promptly to avoid conflict of interest arising during the course of trial.

This Court has condemned such behavior in the past. See, Skelton v. State, 672 P.2d 671 (Okl.Cr.1983); Howerton v. State, 640 P.2d 566 (Okl.Cr.1982).

IT IS THEREFORE THE ORDER OF THIS COURT, that this case be REVERSED and REMANDED FOR NEW TRIAL.

ED PARKS, P.J.

TOM BRETT, J.

HEZ J. BUSSEY, J., dissents.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Worthen v. State, 1986 OK CR 24, 715 P.2d 81, 1986 Okla. Crim. App. LEXIS 212 (Okla. Ct. App. 1986).

1986 OK CR 24 (Worthen v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Robison v. State
1991 OK CR 111 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma, 1991)
Jackson v. State
1988 OK CR 236 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma, 1988)