Worth v. Worth

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Worth v. Worth

554 So. 2d 586, 1989 Fla. App. LEXIS 7257, 1989 WL 153764

District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided December 19, 1989·No. No. 89-854·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Concluding that jurisdiction is concurrent in both Ohio and Florida, we reverse the trial court’s order determining that it had exclusive jurisdiction. See Newcomb v. Newcomb, 507 So.2d 1145 (Fla. 3d DCA 1987); Hickey v. Baxter, 461 So.2d 1364 (Fla. 1st DCA 1984); § 61.1308, Fla.Stat. (1987). Future motions should be considered under the forum non conveniens provisions of the Uniform Child Custody Jurisdiction Act. Genoe v. Genoe, 515 So.2d 237 (Fla. 4th DCA), review denied, 513 So.2d 1061 (Fla.1987); § 61.1316, Fla. Stat. (1987).

Reversed and remanded.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

Concluding that jurisdiction is concurrent in both Ohio and Florida, we reverse the trial court’s order determining that it had exclusive jurisdiction. See Newcomb v. Newcomb, 507 So.2d 1145 (Fla. 3d DCA 1987); Hickey v. Baxter, 461 So.2d 1364 (Fla. 1st DCA 1984); § 61.1308, Fla.Stat. (1987). Future motions should be considered under the forum non conveniens provisions of the Uniform Child Custody Jurisdiction Act. Genoe v. Genoe, 515 So.2d 237 (Fla. 4th DCA), review denied, 513 So.2d 1061 (Fla.1987); § 61.1316, Fla. Stat. (1987).

Reversed and remanded.

Worth v. Worth, 554 So. 2d 586, 1989 Fla. App. LEXIS 7257, 1989 WL 153764 (Fla. Ct. App. 1989).

Pincite

554 So. 2d 586 (Worth v. Worth) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related