Worth v. Worth

554 So. 2d 586, 1989 Fla. App. LEXIS 7257, 1989 WL 153764
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedDecember 19, 1989
DocketNo. 89-854
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 554 So. 2d 586 (Worth v. Worth) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Worth v. Worth, 554 So. 2d 586, 1989 Fla. App. LEXIS 7257, 1989 WL 153764 (Fla. Ct. App. 1989).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Concluding that jurisdiction is concurrent in both Ohio and Florida, we reverse the trial court’s order determining that it had exclusive jurisdiction. See Newcomb v. Newcomb, 507 So.2d 1145 (Fla. 3d DCA 1987); Hickey v. Baxter, 461 So.2d 1364 (Fla. 1st DCA 1984); § 61.1308, Fla.Stat. (1987). Future motions should be considered under the forum non conveniens provisions of the Uniform Child Custody Jurisdiction Act. Genoe v. Genoe, 515 So.2d 237 (Fla. 4th DCA), review denied, 513 So.2d 1061 (Fla.1987); § 61.1316, Fla. Stat. (1987).

Reversed and remanded.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Alvarez v. Alvarez
566 So. 2d 516 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1990)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
554 So. 2d 586, 1989 Fla. App. LEXIS 7257, 1989 WL 153764, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/worth-v-worth-fladistctapp-1989.