Worth v. Whidby

244 S.E.2d 242, 240 Ga. 775, 1978 Ga. LEXIS 826
CourtSupreme Court of Georgia
DecidedFebruary 22, 1978
Docket32955
StatusPublished

This text of 244 S.E.2d 242 (Worth v. Whidby) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Worth v. Whidby, 244 S.E.2d 242, 240 Ga. 775, 1978 Ga. LEXIS 826 (Ga. 1978).

Opinion

Per curiam.

The lessee of a farm filed suit for specific performance of an option to purchase and for damages. The lessor offered evidence as to a cancellation agreement and the [776]*776jury found in his favor. Plaintiff appeals the denial of his motion for new trial urging errors in the qualification of the jury, the admission and exclusion of evidence, and in the charge of the court. We find no reversible error.

Argued January 10, 1978 Decided February 22, 1978. Sumner & Mitchell, Douglas W. Mitchell, III, for appellant. Bennett, Pedrick & Bennett, E. Kontz Bennett, Sr., for appellee.

Judgment affirmed.

All the Justices concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
244 S.E.2d 242, 240 Ga. 775, 1978 Ga. LEXIS 826, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/worth-v-whidby-ga-1978.