Worth v. Whidby
This text of 244 S.E.2d 242 (Worth v. Whidby) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
The lessee of a farm filed suit for specific performance of an option to purchase and for damages. The lessor offered evidence as to a cancellation agreement and the [776]*776jury found in his favor. Plaintiff appeals the denial of his motion for new trial urging errors in the qualification of the jury, the admission and exclusion of evidence, and in the charge of the court. We find no reversible error.
Judgment affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
244 S.E.2d 242, 240 Ga. 775, 1978 Ga. LEXIS 826, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/worth-v-whidby-ga-1978.