Worth v. Whidby

Supreme Court of Georgia

Worth v. Whidby

244 S.E.2d 242, 240 Ga. 775, 1978 Ga. LEXIS 826

Supreme Court of Georgia·Decided February 22, 1978·No. 32955·Published

Opinion

Per curiam.

The lessee of a farm filed suit for specific performance of an option to purchase and for damages. The lessor offered evidence as to a cancellation agreement and the [776]*776jury found in his favor. Plaintiff appeals the denial of his motion for new trial urging errors in the qualification of the jury, the admission and exclusion of evidence, and in the charge of the court. We find no reversible error.

Argued January 10, 1978 Decided February 22, 1978. Sumner & Mitchell, Douglas W. Mitchell, III, for appellant. Bennett, Pedrick & Bennett, E. Kontz Bennett, Sr., for appellee.

Judgment affirmed.

All the Justices concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per curiam.

The lessee of a farm filed suit for specific performance of an option to purchase and for damages. The lessor offered evidence as to a cancellation agreement and the [776]*776jury found in his favor. Plaintiff appeals the denial of his motion for new trial urging errors in the qualification of the jury, the admission and exclusion of evidence, and in the charge of the court. We find no reversible error.

Argued January 10, 1978 Decided February 22, 1978. Sumner & Mitchell, Douglas W. Mitchell, III, for appellant. Bennett, Pedrick & Bennett, E. Kontz Bennett, Sr., for appellee.

Judgment affirmed.

All the Justices concur.

Worth v. Whidby, 244 S.E.2d 242, 240 Ga. 775, 1978 Ga. LEXIS 826 (Ga. 1978).

Pincite

244 S.E.2d 242 (Worth v. Whidby) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.