Worth v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma

Worth v. State

1931 OK CR 342, 1 P.2d 822, 51 Okla. Crim. 360, 1931 Okla. Crim. App. LEXIS 323

CourtCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma

DecidedJuly 31, 1931

DocketNo. A-7968.

StatusPublished

This text of 1931 OK CR 342 (Worth v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Worth v. State, 1931 OK CR 342, 1 P.2d 822, 51 Okla. Crim. 360, 1931 Okla. Crim. App. LEXIS 323 (Okla. Ct. App. 1931).

Pincite

Opinion

DAVENPORT, P. J.

The paintiff in error, hereinafter referred to' as the defendant, was convicted of bigamy, and sentenced to serve a term of two years in the penitentiary, and appeals.

The proof in this case shows O. P. Worth is one and the same person as Arnold R. Hawks; that on the 26th day of October, 1929, under the name of O. P. Worth, the defendant was married to Leola Youtsey, by E. B. Ambler, justice of the peace, in the city of Chandler, Lincoln county, Okla.; at the time of his marriage to Leola Yout-sey, the defendant had a former wife, Alice Hawks, living, from whom he had not been divorced.

The defendant offered no testimony.

Five errors have been assigned as grounds for reversal. No brief has been filed in support of the errors assigned, nor has any oral argument been presented. The record has been examined. The evidence is sufficient to sustain the judgment. There are no errors in the record to justify this court in reversing the case.

The judgment is affirmed.

EDWARDS and CHAPPELL, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI