Worth Savings Bank v. Foster
This text of 221 N.W. 12 (Worth Savings Bank v. Foster) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Minnesota primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Appeal by defendant from an order denying his motion for a new trial.
*294 All questions raised by this appeal are disposed of by the opinion in the case of Olsen v. Hoffmann, 175 Minn. 287, 221 N. W. 10. The fact that the notes were indorsed by the payee “without recourse,” does not indicate bad faith. Collins v. McDowell, 65 Minn. 110, 67 N. W. 845; Park v. Hudson, 154 Minn. 471, 479, 192 N. W. 112.
Order affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
221 N.W. 12, 175 Minn. 293, 1928 Minn. LEXIS 874, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/worth-savings-bank-v-foster-minn-1928.