WORTH CHEMICAL CORPORATION v. Freeman

136 S.E.2d 118, 261 N.C. 780, 1964 N.C. LEXIS 586
Supreme Court of North Carolina·Decided May 6, 1964·No. 598·Published·Cited by 7 cases

Opinion

Per Curiam.

At the time the relationship of employer and employee was established between the plaintiff and defendant Freeman on September 1, 1960, no written contract evidenced a covenant restricting Freeman’s right to engage in competitive employment. To be enforceable such a covenant must be (1) in writing, (2) supported by a valid consideration, and (3) reasonable as to terms, times and territory. The written contract of September 16, 1960 was a new contract without a new consideration. This case is controlled by Greene v. Kelley, 261 N.C. 166, 134 S.E. 2d 166. Judge Phillips correctly declined to issue the injunction. His judgment is

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

WORTH CHEMICAL CORPORATION v. Freeman, 136 S.E.2d 118, 261 N.C. 780, 1964 N.C. LEXIS 586 (N.C. 1964).

136 S.E.2d 118 (WORTH CHEMICAL CORPORATION v. Freeman) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

RLM Communications, Inc. v. Tuschen
66 F. Supp. 3d 681 (E.D. North Carolina, 2014)
Burton v. Williams
689 S.E.2d 174 (Court of Appeals of North Carolina, 2010)
Battleground Veterinary Hosp., P.C. v. McGeoughâ
2007 NCBC 33 (North Carolina Business Court, 2007)
Reynolds and Reynolds Co. v. Tart
955 F. Supp. 547 (W.D. North Carolina, 1997)
Whittaker General Medical Corp. v. Daniel
379 S.E.2d 824 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1989)
Davies & Davies Agency, Inc. v. Davies
298 N.W.2d 127 (Supreme Court of Minnesota, 1980)
Seaboard Industries, Inc. v. Blair
178 S.E.2d 781 (Court of Appeals of North Carolina, 1971)