Worster Motor Lines, Inc. v. Ross

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Worster Motor Lines, Inc. v. Ross

152 A.2d 767, 396 Pa. 490, 1959 Pa. LEXIS 571

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania·Decided June 30, 1959·No. Appeal, No. 39·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

Pee Curiam,

The findings of the chancellor are supported by substantial evidence. Having been confirmed by the court en banc, on exceptions thereto, they have the binding effect of a jury’s verdict and will not be disturbed on [491] appeal: Maxwell v. Schaefer, 381 Pa. 13, 19, 112 A. 2d 69. From the findings, so established, the chancellor correctly drew the legal conclusions which, in turn, have resulted in the final decree entered by the court en banc.

The decree is affirmed at the appellant’s costs.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Opinion

Pee Curiam,

The findings of the chancellor are supported by substantial evidence. Having been confirmed by the court en banc, on exceptions thereto, they have the binding effect of a jury’s verdict and will not be disturbed on [491] appeal: Maxwell v. Schaefer, 381 Pa. 13, 19, 112 A. 2d 69. From the findings, so established, the chancellor correctly drew the legal conclusions which, in turn, have resulted in the final decree entered by the court en banc.

The decree is affirmed at the appellant’s costs.

Worster Motor Lines, Inc. v. Ross, 152 A.2d 767, 396 Pa. 490, 1959 Pa. LEXIS 571 (Pa. 1959).

Pincite

152 A.2d 767 (Worster Motor Lines, Inc. v. Ross) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related