Worster Motor Lines, Inc. v. Ross
This text of 152 A.2d 767 (Worster Motor Lines, Inc. v. Ross) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Pennsylvania primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Opinion
The findings of the chancellor are supported by substantial evidence. Having been confirmed by the court en banc, on exceptions thereto, they have the binding effect of a jury’s verdict and will not be disturbed on [491]*491appeal: Maxwell v. Schaefer, 381 Pa. 13, 19, 112 A. 2d 69. From the findings, so established, the chancellor correctly drew the legal conclusions which, in turn, have resulted in the final decree entered by the court en banc.
The decree is affirmed at the appellant’s costs.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
152 A.2d 767, 396 Pa. 490, 1959 Pa. LEXIS 571, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/worster-motor-lines-inc-v-ross-pa-1959.