Worsley v. Perdue

• Court: Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
• Decided: January 3, 2011
• Docket: 10-1848
• Status: Unpublished

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 10-1848

EDDIE LEE WORSLEY,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

v.

BEVERLY PERDUE, Governor,

Defendant - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at Raleigh. James C. Dever III, District Judge. (5:10-cv-00257-D)

Submitted: December 21, 2010 Decided: January 3, 2011

Before NIEMEYER and KEENAN, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Eddie Lee Worsley, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:

Eddie Lee Worsley appeals the district court’s order

dismissing his civil action pursuant to 28 U.S.C.

§ 1915(e)(2)(B) (2006). On appeal, we confine our review to the

issues raised in the Appellant’s brief. See 4th Cir. R. 34(b).

Because Worsley’s informal brief does not challenge the basis

for the district court’s disposition, Worsley has forfeited

appellate review of the court’s order. Accordingly, we affirm

the district court’s judgment. We dispense with oral argument

because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented

in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the

decisional process.

AFFIRMED