Worsham v. Trimble

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Worsham v. Trimble

169 S.E.2d 689, 120 Ga. App. 180, 1969 Ga. App. LEXIS 707

Court of Appeals of Georgia·Decided July 10, 1969·No. 44605·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

Bell, Presiding Judge.

Of the eight enumerations of error, the first three are the general grounds. There was evidence in the case sufficient to authorize the finding of liability. The damages awarded were within the amount stipulated by the parties. The remaining enumerations object t» the charge. The record shows that the trial court properly gave the plaintiff and the defendant ample opportunity to raise objections to his charge but each party stated in his place that he had none. See Code Ann. § 70-207; Ga. Power Co. v. Maddox, 113 Ga. App. 642 (149 SE2d 393).

Judgment affirmed.

Eberhardt and Deen, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Bell, Presiding Judge.

Of the eight enumerations of error, the first three are the general grounds. There was evidence in the case sufficient to authorize the finding of liability. The damages awarded were within the amount stipulated by the parties. The remaining enumerations object t» the charge. The record shows that the trial court properly gave the plaintiff and the defendant ample opportunity to raise objections to his charge but each party stated in his place that he had none. See Code Ann. § 70-207; Ga. Power Co. v. Maddox, 113 Ga. App. 642 (149 SE2d 393).

Judgment affirmed.

Eberhardt and Deen, JJ., concur.

Worsham v. Trimble, 169 S.E.2d 689, 120 Ga. App. 180, 1969 Ga. App. LEXIS 707 (Ga. Ct. App. 1969).

Pincite

169 S.E.2d 689 (Worsham v. Trimble) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related