Worrill v. Coker

Supreme Court of Georgia

Worrill v. Coker

40 Ga. 582

CourtSupreme Court of Georgia

DecidedDecember 15, 1869

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 40 Ga. 582 (Worrill v. Coker) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Worrill v. Coker, 40 Ga. 582 (Ga. 1869).

Pincite

Opinion

(McCay, having been of counsel below, did not preside.)

This was an injunction from Sumter. The bill of exceptions showed nothing but the action of the Chancellor as to the injunction. When the cause was called here for argument, counsel for plaintiff in error did not furnish the Court or Reporter with any brief abstract of the facts of the case as they existed in the record, as required by the 12th rule of this Court. For that reason the writ of error was dismissed by the Court, ex suo mero motu. See 38th Ga. R., 690.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

(McCay, having been of counsel below, did not preside.)

This was an injunction from Sumter. The bill of exceptions showed nothing but the action of the Chancellor as to the injunction. When the cause was called here for argument, counsel for plaintiff in error did not furnish the Court or Reporter with any brief abstract of the facts of the case as they existed in the record, as required by the 12th rule of this Court. For that reason the writ of error was dismissed by the Court, ex suo mero motu. See 38th Ga. R., 690.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

40 Ga. 582, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/worrill-v-coker-ga-1869.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack