Worrell v. Miller

114 So. 383, 94 Fla. 641
CourtSupreme Court of Florida
DecidedOctober 13, 1927
StatusPublished

This text of 114 So. 383 (Worrell v. Miller) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Worrell v. Miller, 114 So. 383, 94 Fla. 641 (Fla. 1927).

Opinion

Pee Curiam.

This case is here on writ of error the second time.

The controlling law applicable to the case was embraced in the opinions delivered when the case was before this Court on a former writ of error where there was a judgment for plaintiff which was reversed by this Court. Worrell v. Ford, 91 Fla. 44, 109 Sou. 440.

This cause having heretofore been submitted to the Court upon the transcript of the record of the judgment herein, and briefs and argument of counsel for the respective parties, and the record having been seen and inspected, and the Court being now advised of its judgment to be given in the premises, it seems to the Court that there is no error in the said judgment; it is, therefore, considered, ordered and adjudged by the Court that the said judgment of the Circuit Court be, and the same is hereby affirmed.

Affirmed.

Whitfield, P. J., and Terrell and Buford, J. J., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Florida East Coast Railway Co. v. George
107 So. 266 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1926)
Worrell v. Ford
109 So. 440 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1926)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
114 So. 383, 94 Fla. 641, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/worrell-v-miller-fla-1927.