Worrell v. Adams

Supreme Court of Georgia

Worrell v. Adams

45 Ga. 313

DecidedJanuary 15, 1872

StatusPublished

This text of 45 Ga. 313 (Worrell v. Adams) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Worrell v. Adams, 45 Ga. 313 (Ga. 1872).

Pincite

Opinion

This case was tried below upon issuable pleas filed by the securities upon the administrator’s bond. The principal filed no plea. The jury found for the securities, but made no finding as to the principal. The plaintiff brought the cause here, averring errors, etc.

Here, upon consent of counsel, this Court ordered that the judgment below should be affirmed, “ provided nothing [314]*314in this order shall be so construed as to preclude the plaintiff from proceeding against said principal in the Court below.” 24th February, 1872.

E. J. Raiford; B. Worrell; J. L. Wimberly, for plaintiff in error. M. J. Crawford; Beall & Tucker, for defendants.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

This case was tried below upon issuable pleas filed by the securities upon the administrator’s bond. The principal filed no plea. The jury found for the securities, but made no finding as to the principal. The plaintiff brought the cause here, averring errors, etc.

Here, upon consent of counsel, this Court ordered that the judgment below should be affirmed, “ provided nothing [314]*314in this order shall be so construed as to preclude the plaintiff from proceeding against said principal in the Court below.” 24th February, 1872.

E. J. Raiford; B. Worrell; J. L. Wimberly, for plaintiff in error. M. J. Crawford; Beall & Tucker, for defendants.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

45 Ga. 313, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/worrell-v-adams-ga-1872.