Worrell and Wiley v. Erck and Erck

146 So. 659, 108 Fla. 221
Supreme Court of Florida·Decided February 6, 1933·Published·Cited by 6 cases

Opinion

Per Curiam.

This cause having heretofore been submitted to the Court upon the transcript of the record of the judgment herein, and briefs and argument of counsel for the respective parties, and the record having been seen and inspected, and the Court being now advised of its judgment to be given in the premises, it seems to the Court that there *222 is no error in the said judgment; it is, therefore, considered, ordered and adjudged by the Court that the said judgment of the Circuit Court be, and the same is hereby affirmed.

Whitfield, P. J., and Brown and Buford, J. J., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Worrell and Wiley v. Erck and Erck, 146 So. 659, 108 Fla. 221 (Fla. 1933).

146 So. 659 (Worrell and Wiley v. Erck and Erck) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Sutton v. Smith
603 So. 2d 693 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1992)
McKissick v. Bilger
480 So. 2d 211 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1985)
Ratner v. Central Nat. Bank of Miami
414 So. 2d 210 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1982)
Rennolds v. Rennolds
312 So. 2d 538 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1975)
Davis v. Evans
132 So. 2d 476 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1961)
Newman v. Newman
48 N.E.2d 455 (Indiana Supreme Court, 1943)