Home/Supreme Court of Florida/Worrell and Wiley v. Erck and Erck

Worrell and Wiley v. Erck and Erck

146 So. 659, 108 Fla. 221
CourtSupreme Court of Florida
DecidedFebruary 6, 1933
StatusPublished
Cited by6 cases

This text of 146 So. 659 (Worrell and Wiley v. Erck and Erck) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Worrell and Wiley v. Erck and Erck, 146 So. 659, 108 Fla. 221 (Fla. 1933).

Opinion

Per Curiam.

This cause having heretofore been submitted to the Court upon the transcript of the record of the judgment herein, and briefs and argument of counsel for the respective parties, and the record having been seen and inspected, and the Court being now advised of its judgment to be given in the premises, it seems to the Court that there *222 is no error in the said judgment; it is, therefore, considered, ordered and adjudged by the Court that the said judgment of the Circuit Court be, and the same is hereby affirmed.

Whitfield, P. J., and Brown and Buford, J. J., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Sutton v. Smith
603 So. 2d 693 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1992)
McKissick v. Bilger
480 So. 2d 211 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1985)
Ratner v. Central Nat. Bank of Miami
414 So. 2d 210 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1982)
Rennolds v. Rennolds
312 So. 2d 538 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1975)
Davis v. Evans
132 So. 2d 476 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1961)
Newman v. Newman
48 N.E.2d 455 (Indiana Supreme Court, 1943)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
146 So. 659, 108 Fla. 221, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/worrell-and-wiley-v-erck-and-erck-fla-1933.