Wormley v. District of Columbia
181 U.S. 402, 21 S. Ct. 609, 45 L. Ed. 921, 1901 U.S. LEXIS 1374
Opinion
And now, April 29, 1901. the judgments in the foregoing cases are affirmed, with costs, on the authority of Parsons v. District of Columbia, 170 U. S. 45, and French v. Barber Asphalt Paving Co., ante, 324.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Wormley v. District of Columbia, 181 U.S. 402, 21 S. Ct. 609, 45 L. Ed. 921, 1901 U.S. LEXIS 1374 (1901).
181 U.S. 402 (Wormley v. District of Columbia) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Bung's Bar & Grille, Inc. v. TP. COUNCIL OF FLORENCE
502 A.2d 1198 (New Jersey Superior Court App Division, 1985)
Palmer v. Mayor and Board of Aldermen
197 So. 697 (Supreme Court of Louisiana, 1940)
Donaldson's Heirs v. City of New Orleans
118 So. 134 (Supreme Court of Louisiana, 1927)
Lyon v. Mayor C.C. of Hyattsville
93 A. 919 (Court of Appeals of Maryland, 1915)
Lanham & Sons Co. v. City of Rome
71 S.E. 770 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1911)
Wilzinski v. City of Greenville
85 Miss. 393 (Mississippi Supreme Court, 1904)
Kettle v. City of Dallas
80 S.W. 874 (Court of Appeals of Texas, 1904)
Schaefer v. Werling
188 U.S. 516 (Supreme Court, 1903)
Barfield v. Gleason
63 S.W. 964 (Court of Appeals of Kentucky, 1901)