Wormick v. Bryant

5 Ky. Op. 9, 1872 Ky. LEXIS 155
CourtCourt of Appeals of Kentucky
DecidedFebruary 27, 1872
StatusPublished

This text of 5 Ky. Op. 9 (Wormick v. Bryant) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Kentucky primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Wormick v. Bryant, 5 Ky. Op. 9, 1872 Ky. LEXIS 155 (Ky. Ct. App. 1872).

Opinion

Opinion by

Judge Peters:

Appellant’s vendor having elected to abandon the parol contract for the sale of the land to their ancestor, they certainly had a lien on the land for the purchase money which had been actually paid, which would have been- enforceable if he had not parted with it. And his subsequent vendee, with notice of appellant’s lien, can occupy no better position than his vendor. -And if he bought with notice of the lien, as is alleged in the petition, he takes it subject to the incumbrance. Wherefore the judgment is reversed, and the cause is remanded with directions to overrule the demurrer to the petition and for further proceedings consistent herewith.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
5 Ky. Op. 9, 1872 Ky. LEXIS 155, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/wormick-v-bryant-kyctapp-1872.