Worley v. State
This text of Worley v. State (Worley v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Delaware primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE
ROBERT WORLEY, § § No. 393, 2018 Defendant Below, § Appellant, § Court Below: Superior Court § of the State of Delaware v. § § Cr. ID No. 1206000145 A & B (N) STATE OF DELAWARE, § § Plaintiff Below, § Appellee. §
Submitted: October 22, 2018 Decided: January 7, 2019
Before VAUGHN, SEITZ, and TRAYNOR, Justices.
ORDER
After careful consideration of the appellant’s opening brief, the appellee’s
motion to affirm, and the record below, we conclude that the Superior Court’s order
of July 3, 2018, summarily dismissing the appellant’s second motion for
postconviction relief, should be affirmed.* The Superior Court did not err in
concluding that the appellant’s motion did not satisfy the pleading requirements of
Superior Court Criminal Rule 61(d)(2) and thus was procedurally barred.
NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS ORDERED that the motion to affirm is
GRANTED. The judgment of the Superior Court is AFFIRMED.
BY THE COURT: /s/ Collins J. Seitz, Jr. Justice * 2018 WL 3302806 (Del. Super. Ct. July 3, 2018).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Worley v. State, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/worley-v-state-del-2019.