Worley v. Jinks

361 So. 2d 1089, 1978 Ala. LEXIS 1939
Supreme Court of Alabama·Decided September 1, 1978·No. 77-622·Published·Cited by 6 cases

Opinion

FAULKNER, Justice.

We originally granted certiorari to consider the jurisdiction of the probate court in light of constitutional amendment 364 which gave that court “. . . general jurisdiction . . . of adoptions . . . After a thorough review we conclude that the Court of Civil Appeals correctly held that this grant of jurisdiction is not exclusive and does not alter § 12 — 12—35, Code of Ala.1975, providing for transfer of adoption proceedings to the district court on motion of a party. Worley v. Jinks, 361 So.2d 1082 (Ala.Civ.App.1978). Consequently, the writ is quashed as improvidently granted.

WRIT QUASHED.

TORBERT, C. J., and BLOODWORTH, ALMON and EMBRY, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Worley v. Jinks, 361 So. 2d 1089, 1978 Ala. LEXIS 1939 (Ala. 1978).

361 So. 2d 1089 (Worley v. Jinks) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Schalk v. Alabama Department of Pensions & Security
479 So. 2d 1254 (Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama, 1985)
Landers v. ASS'N FOR GUIDANCE, AID, PLACEMENT
472 So. 2d 1055 (Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama, 1985)
Gentry v. STATE DEPT. OF PENSIONS & SEC.
462 So. 2d 929 (Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama, 1984)
Mathews v. Mathews
428 So. 2d 51 (Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama, 1982)
Hamilton v. State
410 So. 2d 64 (Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama, 1982)
Marr v. Marr
383 So. 2d 194 (Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama, 1980)