Worley v. Glentworth

10 N.J.L. 286
Supreme Court of New Jersey·Decided November 15, 1828·Published

Opinion

The Chief Justice

delivered the opinion of the court.

We think we ought not to order the consolidation applied for. We find no principle or precedent to support it. The [287]*287case read by the plaintiffs’ counsel from 9 John. Rep. 262, though of no binding authority here, yet is entitled to weight. In that case the consolidation was refused under stronger circumstances.

The Legislature direct us to consolidate unnecessary actions. Can we say these actions are unnecessary ? The defendant has not shown that the defence is the same in each. Indeed he does not shew that ho has any defence at all.

Motion denied.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Worley v. Glentworth, 10 N.J.L. 286 (N.J. 1828).

10 N.J.L. 286 (Worley v. Glentworth) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Thompson v. Shepherd
9 Johns. 262 (New York Supreme Court, 1812)