Worldwide Express Operations, LLC v. DHL Express (USA), Inc.

Opinion

I)lSi1lSS; Opinion tiled Nov emher 16. 2012

In The (Cnurt uf Appit1Ei Fift1! I1itrirt nf rxu tt Iatta6 No. 05-12-00048-CV

WORLDVV IDE EXPRESS OPERAT1OS, LLC 1)/B/A WORLDWIDE EXPRESS, Appellant

V.

DilL EXPRESS (USA), INC., Appellee

On Appeal from the 192nd JudiciaI District Court Dallas Connt’, Texas Trial Court Cause No. DC-08-15314

MEMORANDUM OPINION Before Justices Moseley, Francis, and Lang Opinion By Justice Lang

Before the Court is the parties’ agreed motion to dismiss the appeal. The pa1ies inform the

Court that they have settled their differences. Accordingly, we grant the parties’ motion and dismiss

the appeal. See TEX. R. App. P. 42.1(a).

DOUGLAS S. LANG 120048F.P05 JUSTICE Qiiitrt uf Appcahi *iftI Utrirt nf rxa at Dat1a JUDGMENT \VORLDWI[)E EXPRESS OPERATIONS. Appeal from the I 92nd Judicial District Court LI C D113i \\‘ORLDWIDF L\PRLSS ol Dallas County, Texas. (Tr.Ct.No. DC-0$— Appellant I 5314). Opinion delivered by Justice Lang, Justices No. 05-12-0004$-CV V. Moseley and Francis, participating.

Based on the Coui-t’s opinion of this date, the appeal is L)ISMISS1I).

It is ORI)EREI) that the parties bear their own costs of the appeal.

Judgment entered November 16, 2012.

[)O UG LAS S. LANG JUSTICE