Worldwide Clinical Trials A/K/A Wct Corporation v. Herlinda Arnold
This text of Worldwide Clinical Trials A/K/A Wct Corporation v. Herlinda Arnold (Worldwide Clinical Trials A/K/A Wct Corporation v. Herlinda Arnold) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
FILED 14-0786 12/24/2014 1:23:20 PM tex-3589887 SUPREME COURT OF TEXAS BLAKE A. HAWTHORNE, CLERK
CASE NO. 14–0786 _____________________________________________
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF TEXAS _____________________________________________
WORLDWIDE CLINICAL TRIALS, a/k/a WTC CORPORATION, Petitioner
V.
HERLINDA ARNOLD, Respondent _____________________________________________
On Petition for Review from the Fourth Court of Appeals, San Antonio, Texas, Case No. 04–13–00609–CV _____________________________________________
RESPONDENT’S MOTION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME TO FILE RESPONSE TO PETITIONER’S PETITION FOR REVIEW _____________________________________________
Respondent, Herlinda Arnold, requests a 30-day extension to file her response to
Petitioner’s Petition for Review and for good cause, would show as follows:
1. The Fourth Court of Appeals issued its opinion and judgment in the underlying
appeal, Case Number No. 04–13–00609–CV, on August 13, 2014.
2. After being granted three extensions of time, Petitioner filed its Petition for
Review with this Court on November 25, 2014.
3. Respondent’s response to Petitioner’s Petition for Review is December 24, 2014.
4. This is Respondent’s first request for an extension of time.
5. Respondent respectfully requests a 30–day extension to file its response so that
the undersigned attorneys can adequately prepare the response.
6. The undersigned attorneys have not had sufficient time to respond to Petitioner’s
Petition for Review due to the Thanksgiving holidays, taking time off for vacation and
hearings and obligations in other cases.
7. Pursuant to TEX. R. APP. P. 10.3, the undersigned attorneys conferred with
counsel for Petitioner, but have yet to receive a response from opposing counsel with
regard to whether he is opposed to this motion.
FOR THESE REASONS, Respondent prays that this Honorable Court grant this
Motion for Extension of Time to File Response to Petitioner’s Petition for Review and
extend the deadline for filing the response to January 26, 2014, and requests all other
relief to which she may be entitled.
Respectfully submitted,
Ecke and Poling, PLLC
By: ______/s/____________________ Joseph R. Ecke SBN: 24082946 1203 Buena Vista #201 San Antonio, Texas 78207 Email: joe.ecke@gmail.com Ph. (210) 645-5356 Fax (210) 775-6490
Law Office of Matthew S. Norris
By: ______/s/____________________ Matthew S. Norris
TBA No. 24076881 6243 IH-10 West, Suite 1010 San Antonio, Texas 78201 Email: mattnorrislaw@gmail.com Ph. (210) 549-7633 Fax (210) 446-4482
ATTORNEYS FOR RESPONDENT
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
I certify that a true and correct copy of the above has been served to all interested parties of record on this the 24th day of December 2014.
Sean Michael Reagan sreagan@lpmfirm.com 9545 Katy Freeway, Suite 200 Houston, Texas 77024
______/s/____________________ Joseph R. Ecke
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Worldwide Clinical Trials A/K/A Wct Corporation v. Herlinda Arnold, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/worldwide-clinical-trials-aka-wct-corporation-v-herlinda-arnold-texapp-2014.