World Business Consultants Ltd. v. Automotive Finishes, Inc.

352 So. 2d 120, 1977 Fla. App. LEXIS 16915
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided November 16, 1977·No. No. 77-654·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Appellant, a Florida corporation, filed a complaint against the appellee, a foreign corporation. In the complaint, appellant alleged that the .appellee’s business had brought it within the parameters of Sections 48.181 and 48.193(l)(a), Florida Statutes (1975). Appellant pled specific facts in support of this allegation.

Appellee moved to abate the action for lack of jurisdiction, but did not file any affidavits or other supportive materials. The trial court granted the motion to abate. Appellant appeals.

We agree with the appellant that the complaint alleged sufficient jurisdictional facts to obtain personal jurisdiction over the appellee pursuant to Florida’s long arm statute and to satisfy the constitutional “minimum contacts” requirement. ’ The burden then shifted to the appellee to make a prima facie showing of the inapplicability of the long arm statute. Electro Engineering Products Co., Inc. v. Lewis, 352 So.2d 862 (Fla.1977); Madax International Corp. v. Delcher Intercontinental Moving Services, Inc., 342 So.2d 1082 (Fla.2d DCA 1977); Dublin Co. v. Peninsular Supply Co., 309 So.2d 207 (Fla.4th DCA 1975).

Accordingly, we reverse the order of abatement with directions to reinstate the complaint.

GRIMES, A. C. J., and SCHEB and OTT, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

World Business Consultants Ltd. v. Automotive Finishes, Inc., 352 So. 2d 120, 1977 Fla. App. LEXIS 16915 (Fla. Ct. App. 1977).

352 So. 2d 120 (World Business Consultants Ltd. v. Automotive Finishes, Inc.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

HARTMAN AGCY., INC. v. Indiana Farmers Mut. Ins. Co.
353 So. 2d 665 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1978)