Works v. Hickerson

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Works v. Hickerson

1914 OK 165, 139 P. 284, 40 Okla. 558, 1914 Okla. LEXIS 90

CourtSupreme Court of Oklahoma

DecidedMarch 24, 1914

Docket5981

StatusPublished

This text of 1914 OK 165 (Works v. Hickerson) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Oklahoma primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Works v. Hickerson, 1914 OK 165, 139 P. 284, 40 Okla. 558, 1914 Okla. LEXIS 90 (Okla. 1914).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

For the reason that the judgment sought to be reversed was rendered and entered in February, 1913, and proceeding in error was not sought to be commenced until January 12, 1914, at which time a transcript of the record with petition in error were filed in this court, this cause must be dismissed, as the same was not commenced within six months from the rendition of the judgment complained of, as required by act approved February 13, 1911, Sess. Laws 1910-11, c. 18, p. 35.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

For the reason that the judgment sought to be reversed was rendered and entered in February, 1913, and proceeding in error was not sought to be commenced until January 12, 1914, at which time a transcript of the record with petition in error were filed in this court, this cause must be dismissed, as the same was not commenced within six months from the rendition of the judgment complained of, as required by act approved February 13, 1911, Sess. Laws 1910-11, c. 18, p. 35.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

1914 OK 165, 139 P. 284, 40 Okla. 558, 1914 Okla. LEXIS 90, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/works-v-hickerson-okla-1914.