Workmen's Mutual Insurance Company, Inc., and Fidelity and Guaranty Insurance Underwriters, Inc. v. Bella Vista Hotel Apartments, Inc.

399 F.2d 693
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
DecidedAugust 22, 1968
Docket25248_1
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 399 F.2d 693 (Workmen's Mutual Insurance Company, Inc., and Fidelity and Guaranty Insurance Underwriters, Inc. v. Bella Vista Hotel Apartments, Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Workmen's Mutual Insurance Company, Inc., and Fidelity and Guaranty Insurance Underwriters, Inc. v. Bella Vista Hotel Apartments, Inc., 399 F.2d 693 (5th Cir. 1968).

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

In the trial court a jury verdict was returned against the appellants, Workmen’s Mutual Insurance Co. and Fidelity & Guaranty Insurance Underwriters Inc., in the amount of $47,750.00 and $14,250.-00 respectively, on an insurance loss as a result of hurricane “Betsy”.

Appellants claim that the loss was excluded by the provisions of the policy. 1 Testimony, including expert opinion, was offered at trial as to the cause of the loss. The jury was instructed as to the exclusion provision of the policy. It was not unreasonable for the jury to find that the damages suffered were caused by wind and not by the excluded causes. There was evidence from which the jury could make this finding. Liberty Mutual Insurance Co. v. Falgoust, 386 F.2d 248 (5th Cir. 1967); Helene Curtis Industries, Inc. v. Pruitt, 385 F.2d 841 (5th Cir., 1967); Planters Manufacturing Co. v. Protection Mutual Insurance Co., 380 F.2d 869 (5th Cir., 1967).

The motion of the appellee for attorney’s fees is denied.

Affirmed.

1

. Both insurance policies provide the following exclusions: “Loss caused by, resulting from, contributed to or aggravated by any of the following: * * * flood, surface water, waves, tidal water or tidal wave, overflow of streams or other bodies of water, or spray from any of the foregoing, all whether driven by wind or not; * * * ”

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Florida Farm Bureau Casualty Insurance v. Mathis
33 So. 3d 94 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2010)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
399 F.2d 693, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/workmens-mutual-insurance-company-inc-and-fidelity-and-guaranty-ca5-1968.