Workmen's Compensation Appeal Board v. Budd Co.

370 A.2d 757, 29 Pa. Commw. 249, 1977 Pa. Commw. LEXIS 748
CourtCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania
DecidedMarch 14, 1977
DocketAppeal, No. 1115 C.D. 1976
StatusPublished
Cited by6 cases

This text of 370 A.2d 757 (Workmen's Compensation Appeal Board v. Budd Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Workmen's Compensation Appeal Board v. Budd Co., 370 A.2d 757, 29 Pa. Commw. 249, 1977 Pa. Commw. LEXIS 748 (Pa. Ct. App. 1977).

Opinion

Opinion by

Judge Mencer,

This appeal has been taken by The Budd Company (employer) from an order of the Workmen’s Compensation Appeal Board (Board) affirming the referee’s award of benefits to Louis J. Braun (claimant) for disfigurement for 11 weeks at the rate of $114 per week and for 4 weeks at the rate of $171 per week. The employer has argued that the award was excessive and that, since the award was for disfigurement, the referee and Board improperly considered a fractured tooth which had been repaired. Since our reading of the record indicates that the employer’s appeal to this Court was not timely, we do not reach these questions in quashing the appeal sua sponte.

Section 427 of The Pennsylvania Workmen’s Compensation Act1 (Act) provides: “Such appeal must in all cases be brought within twenty days after notice of the action of the board has been served upon such party, unless the Commonwealth Court, shall, upon cause shown, extend the time herein provided for taking the appeal.”2 In measuring the 20 days, the date [251]*251of the mailing of the Board’s order will begin the period,3 and the appellant must mail his appeal within 20 days of that date to be timely. General v. E. Roseman Co., 461 Pa. 284, 336 A.2d 287 (1975), rev’g 10 Pa. Commonwealth Ct. 569, 312 A.2d 609 (1973); Workmen’s Compensation Appeal Board v. Johnson, 20 Pa. Commonwealth Ct. 231, 341 A.2d 539 (1975). Here, the Board’s order was mailed on May 27, 1976. by counting May 28 as the first day, the last day for mailing a timely appeal was Thursday, June 16, 1976.4 However, the employer’s appeal was both notarized and postmarked June 17, 1976 and was therefore untimely.

Since the failure to bring a timely appeal is a jurisdictional matter, it may be raised sua sponte and precludes us from reaching the merits. Commonwealth v. Yorktowne Paper Mills, Inc., 419 Pa. 363, 214 A.2d 203 (1965). Therefore, we make the following

Order

And Now, this 14th day of March, 1977, the appeal of The Budd Company from the order of the Workmen’s Compensation Appeal Board dated May 11,1976, is quashed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Jessieco, Inc. v. WCAB (McCutcheon)
Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania, 2021
Ludwikowski v. Workers' Compensation Appeal Board
910 A.2d 99 (Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania, 2006)
Sellers v. Workers' Compensation Appeal Board
713 A.2d 87 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 1998)
Pittsburgh Moose Lodge 46 v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal Board
530 A.2d 982 (Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania, 1987)
Cooper Industrial Products v. Meadows
634 S.W.2d 400 (Court of Appeals of Arkansas, 1982)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
370 A.2d 757, 29 Pa. Commw. 249, 1977 Pa. Commw. LEXIS 748, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/workmens-compensation-appeal-board-v-budd-co-pacommwct-1977.