Workman v. Workman

401 So. 2d 1171, 1981 Fla. App. LEXIS 20704
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedAugust 11, 1981
DocketNo. WW-381
StatusPublished

This text of 401 So. 2d 1171 (Workman v. Workman) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Workman v. Workman, 401 So. 2d 1171, 1981 Fla. App. LEXIS 20704 (Fla. Ct. App. 1981).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

This cause is before us on appeal from a final judgment of dissolution awarding appellant lump sum, rather than periodic, alimony. We affirm, noting that the Circuit Court has reserved jurisdiction to modify the judgment. Therefore, appellant will be able to apply for further permanent alimony when, for example, the lump sum installment payments terminate, her health worsens, or the husband’s financial circumstances improve. See Canakaris v. Canakaris, 382 So.2d 1197, 1201 (Fla.1980); Hyatt v. Hyatt, 315 So.2d 11 (Fla.3d DCA 1975).

BOOTH, SHAW and WENTWORTH, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Hyatt v. Hyatt
315 So. 2d 11 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1975)
Canakaris v. Canakaris
382 So. 2d 1197 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1980)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
401 So. 2d 1171, 1981 Fla. App. LEXIS 20704, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/workman-v-workman-fladistctapp-1981.