Workman v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Workman v. State

825 So. 2d 508, 2002 Fla. App. LEXIS 12914, 2002 WL 2030859

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedSeptember 6, 2002

DocketNo. 1D02-1884

StatusPublished

This text of 825 So. 2d 508 (Workman v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Workman v. State, 825 So. 2d 508, 2002 Fla. App. LEXIS 12914, 2002 WL 2030859 (Fla. Ct. App. 2002).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

The appellant challenges the trial court’s order summarily denying his rule 3.800 motion for jail credit. The appellant has made a facially sufficient claim for jail credit under rule 3.800 by providing the dates for which he is seeking credit, the date of his sentence, and alleging that the jail certificate would show that he is entitled to credit. See Thomas v. State, 634 So.2d 175, 177 (Fla. 1st DCA 1994); State v. Mancino, 714 So.2d 429, 433 (Fla.1998). The trial court failed to reference or attach any records refuting the appellant’s allegations. We accordingly reverse and remand for the trial court to support its denial with record attachments or to grant the relief sought.

REVERSED and REMANDED.

DAVIS, BENTON and POLSTON, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

The appellant challenges the trial court’s order summarily denying his rule 3.800 motion for jail credit. The appellant has made a facially sufficient claim for jail credit under rule 3.800 by providing the dates for which he is seeking credit, the date of his sentence, and alleging that the jail certificate would show that he is entitled to credit. See Thomas v. State, 634 So.2d 175, 177 (Fla. 1st DCA 1994); State v. Mancino, 714 So.2d 429, 433 (Fla.1998). The trial court failed to reference or attach any records refuting the appellant’s allegations. We accordingly reverse and remand for the trial court to support its denial with record attachments or to grant the relief sought.

REVERSED and REMANDED.

DAVIS, BENTON and POLSTON, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

825 So. 2d 508, 2002 Fla. App. LEXIS 12914, 2002 WL 2030859, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/workman-v-state-fladistctapp-2002.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack