Workman v. Eyler
121 A. 515, 94 N.J. Eq. 526, 9 Stock. 526, 1923 N.J. LEXIS 691
Opinion
The decree appealed from will be affirmed, for the reasons stated in the opinion filed in the court below by Vice-Chancellor Learning.
For affirmance — Ti-ie Ciiiee-Justice, Swayze, Teen-chard, Parker, Bergen, Minturn, Black, ICatzenbaci-i, White, Heppenheimer, Williams, Ackerson, Van Bus-kirk—13.
For reversal—Hone.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Workman v. Eyler, 121 A. 515, 94 N.J. Eq. 526, 9 Stock. 526, 1923 N.J. LEXIS 691 (N.J. 1923).
121 A. 515 (Workman v. Eyler) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Kues v. Di Maria
155 A. 22 (New Jersey Court of Chancery, 1931)