Workman v. Eastern Live Poultry Co.
This text of 3 A.D.2d 675 (Workman v. Eastern Live Poultry Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, the appeal is from a judgment entered on a verdict for $40,000 in favor of respondent. Judgment reversed and new trial granted, with costs to abide the event, unless respondent stipulate, within 20 days after the entry of the order hereon, to reduce the verdict to $30,000, in which event the judgment, as so reduced, is unanimously affirmed, without costs. In our opinion the verdict is excessive. Wenzel, Beldock, Murphy and Kleinfeld, JJ., concur; Holán, P. J., dissents and votes to affirm the judgment without reduction.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
3 A.D.2d 675, 158 N.Y.S.2d 636, 1957 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 6684, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/workman-v-eastern-live-poultry-co-nyappdiv-1957.