Workman v. Cannon

Supreme Court of Delaware

Workman v. Cannon

5 Del. 91

DecidedJuly 1, 1848

StatusPublished

This text of 5 Del. 91 (Workman v. Cannon) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Delaware primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Workman v. Cannon, 5 Del. 91 (Del. 1848).

Pincite

Opinion

Judgment.The court being of opinion that the devise to Mary Inslee, the daughter of the testator, she having become a widow, thereupon took effect and became vested, it is therefore considered and adjudged by the court that the judgment of the Superior Court be and the same is hereby in all things affirmed, the record remanded and the costs in error be paid by the plaintiff in error.

Judgment affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Judgment.The court being of opinion that the devise to Mary Inslee, the daughter of the testator, she having become a widow, thereupon took effect and became vested, it is therefore considered and adjudged by the court that the judgment of the Superior Court be and the same is hereby in all things affirmed, the record remanded and the costs in error be paid by the plaintiff in error.

Judgment affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

5 Del. 91, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/workman-v-cannon-del-1848.