Workman & Sons, Inc. v. Randolph
773 P.2d 812, 96 Or. App. 639, 1989 Ore. App. LEXIS 604
Opinion
Defendant appeals from a judgment for plaintiff in this action for money due on an account. None of his arguments has any merit, and we find that he had no probable cause for taking the appeal. Accordingly, we affirm and impose a ten percent penalty, pursuant to ORS 19.160. Broyles v. Brown, 295 Or 795, 671 P2d 94 (1983).
Affirmed; additional judgment of $696 awarded to respondent.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Workman & Sons, Inc. v. Randolph, 773 P.2d 812, 96 Or. App. 639, 1989 Ore. App. LEXIS 604 (Or. Ct. App. 1989).
773 P.2d 812 (Workman & Sons, Inc. v. Randolph) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Broyles v. Estate of Brown
671 P.2d 94 (Oregon Supreme Court, 1983)