Workman & Sons, Inc. v. Randolph

773 P.2d 812, 96 Or. App. 639, 1989 Ore. App. LEXIS 604
CourtCourt of Appeals of Oregon
DecidedMay 17, 1989
Docket65-688; CA A50094
StatusPublished

This text of 773 P.2d 812 (Workman & Sons, Inc. v. Randolph) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Oregon primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Workman & Sons, Inc. v. Randolph, 773 P.2d 812, 96 Or. App. 639, 1989 Ore. App. LEXIS 604 (Or. Ct. App. 1989).

Opinion

PER CURIAM

Defendant appeals from a judgment for plaintiff in this action for money due on an account. None of his arguments has any merit, and we find that he had no probable cause for taking the appeal. Accordingly, we affirm and impose a ten percent penalty, pursuant to ORS 19.160. Broyles v. Brown, 295 Or 795, 671 P2d 94 (1983).

Affirmed; additional judgment of $696 awarded to respondent.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Broyles v. Estate of Brown
671 P.2d 94 (Oregon Supreme Court, 1983)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
773 P.2d 812, 96 Or. App. 639, 1989 Ore. App. LEXIS 604, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/workman-sons-inc-v-randolph-orctapp-1989.