Work v. Phung
This text of 266 P.3d 220 (Work v. Phung) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Washington Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Mini-Dozer WORK, Wayne R. Richardson, Petitioners,
v.
LINH NGUYEN PHUNG, Respondent.
Supreme Court of Washington.
ORDER
¶ 1 Department I of the Court, composed of Chief Justice Madsen and Justices C. Johnson, Owens, J.M. Johnson and Wiggins, considered at its January 4, 2012, Motion Calendar, whether review should be granted pursuant to RAP 13.4(b), and unanimously agreed that the following order be entered.
¶ 2 IT IS ORDERED:
¶ 3 That the Respondent's motion to strike and dismiss the petition for review is denied. The Petition for Review is denied. The Respondent's *221 request for attorney fees as a sanction is granted. The Respondent is awarded reasonable attorney fees and expenses pursuant to RAP 18.9(a). The amount of the attorney fees and expenses will be determined by the Supreme Court Clerk pursuant to RAP 18.1. Pursuant to RAP 18.1(d), Respondent should file an affidavit with the Clerk of the Washington State Supreme Court.
/s/ Madsen, C.J. CHIEF JUSTICEFree access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
266 P.3d 220, 173 Wash. 2d 1009, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/work-v-phung-wash-2012.