WORDS v. State

356 S.W.3d 882, 2012 WL 117950, 2012 Mo. App. LEXIS 55
Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided January 17, 2012·No. WD 73043·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

Order

PER CURIAM.

John Words appeals the denial of his Rule 24.035 motion for post-conviction relief after an evidentiary hearing. Words contends the motion court clearly erred in denying his claim that plea counsel was ineffective in failing to advise him about the waiver of a statute of limitations defense. For reasons explained in a Memorandum provided to the parties, we find no error and affirm the motion court’s judgment.

AFFIRMED. Rule 84.16(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

WORDS v. State, 356 S.W.3d 882, 2012 WL 117950, 2012 Mo. App. LEXIS 55 (Mo. Ct. App. 2012).

356 S.W.3d 882 (WORDS v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

State v. Spencer
356 S.W.3d 882 (Missouri Court of Appeals, 2012)