WORDS v. State

Missouri Court of Appeals

WORDS v. State

356 S.W.3d 882, 2012 WL 117950, 2012 Mo. App. LEXIS 55

CourtMissouri Court of Appeals

DecidedJanuary 17, 2012

DocketWD 73043

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 356 S.W.3d 882 (WORDS v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Missouri Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

WORDS v. State, 356 S.W.3d 882, 2012 WL 117950, 2012 Mo. App. LEXIS 55 (Mo. Ct. App. 2012).

Pincite

Opinion

Order

PER CURIAM.

John Words appeals the denial of his Rule 24.035 motion for post-conviction relief after an evidentiary hearing. Words contends the motion court clearly erred in denying his claim that plea counsel was ineffective in failing to advise him about the waiver of a statute of limitations defense. For reasons explained in a Memorandum provided to the parties, we find no error and affirm the motion court’s judgment.

AFFIRMED. Rule 84.16(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Order

PER CURIAM.

John Words appeals the denial of his Rule 24.035 motion for post-conviction relief after an evidentiary hearing. Words contends the motion court clearly erred in denying his claim that plea counsel was ineffective in failing to advise him about the waiver of a statute of limitations defense. For reasons explained in a Memorandum provided to the parties, we find no error and affirm the motion court’s judgment.

AFFIRMED. Rule 84.16(b).

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

356 S.W.3d 882, 2012 WL 117950, 2012 Mo. App. LEXIS 55, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/words-v-state-moctapp-2012.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack