Worden v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas

Worden v. State

59 S.W.2d 1117, 1933 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 757

CourtCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas

DecidedApril 12, 1933

DocketNo. 15946

StatusPublished

This text of 59 S.W.2d 1117 (Worden v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Worden v. State, 59 S.W.2d 1117, 1933 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 757 (Tex. 1933).

Pincite

Opinion

MORROW, Presiding Judge.

The offense is burglary; penalty assessed at confinement in the penitentiary for a period of two years.

The indictment appears regular and regularly presented. The evidence heard in the trial court is not brought up for review.

In the motion for new trial no questions are presented which demand discussion in the absence of the evidence that was before the jury.

Complaints of the charge of the court appearing for. the first time in the motion for new trial are not tenable. Moreover, in the absence of the facts upon .which the conviction is based, appraisement of the complaints of the charge of the court is impracticable.

The judgment is affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI