Worden v. Sharp

56 Ill. 104
CourtIllinois Supreme Court
DecidedSeptember 15, 1870
StatusPublished
Cited by6 cases

This text of 56 Ill. 104 (Worden v. Sharp) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Illinois Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Worden v. Sharp, 56 Ill. 104 (Ill. 1870).

Opinion

Per Curiam:

This was an action, originally brought before a justice of the peace, in which the plaintiff recovered judgment, and, on appeal to the circuit court, he recovered judgment a second time. There is no ground for reversing it. The statute of frauds has no application. The contract was executed, on one side, by the defendant’s receipt of a conveyance for the five acres from Crane. Crane gave him this deed, as he himself testifies, under the contract between Crane and Sharp, and Sharp and the defendant, and the jury did rightly in finding a verdict for Sharp against defendant, for the contract price of the land, less the $50 paid by the defendant to Crane.

Judgment affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Svatik v. Niles
13 N.E.2d 101 (Appellate Court of Illinois, 1938)
Johnston v. Messinger
226 Ill. App. 397 (Appellate Court of Illinois, 1922)
Griffin v. W. L. Pfeffer Lumber Co.
211 Ill. App. 71 (Appellate Court of Illinois, 1918)
Kerr v. Hillyard
170 P. 981 (Utah Supreme Court, 1918)
Walsh v. Colclough
56 F. 778 (Seventh Circuit, 1893)
Niland v. Murphy
41 N.W. 335 (Wisconsin Supreme Court, 1889)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
56 Ill. 104, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/worden-v-sharp-ill-1870.