Worden v. Dodge

4 Denio 159
CourtNew York Supreme Court
DecidedJanuary 15, 1847
StatusPublished
Cited by6 cases

This text of 4 Denio 159 (Worden v. Dodge) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Worden v. Dodge, 4 Denio 159 (N.Y. Super. Ct. 1847).

Opinion

By the Court, Beardsley, J.

The nonsuit was proper. A promissory note must be payable absolutely, and not upon any contingency as to time or event. (3 Kent, 5th ed. p. 74; Smith on Merc. Law. 113, 116; Story on Prom. Notes, §§ 1, 22 to 26; [160]*160id. on Bills of Exch. §§ 46, 47; Chit. on Bills, 10th Amer. ed., p. 132 to 139.)

This was not such an engagement, for although the promise was to make payments at certain specified times, the payments were to be made out of the net proceeds ” of ore to be raised and sold ” from a certain ore bed. Here was a contingency; the fund might turn out to be inadequate, in which case there would be no obligation to pay at any time. It was not a promise to pay absolutely and at all events,” as a promissory note always is.

New trial denied.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

District Landowners Trust v. Doherty
30 P.2d 319 (Supreme Court of Colorado, 1934)
Thompson v. Wheatland Mercantile Co.
66 P. 595 (Wyoming Supreme Court, 1901)
Gorrell v. Home Life Ins. Co. of New York
63 F. 371 (Seventh Circuit, 1894)
Herter v. Goss & Edsall Co.
30 A. 252 (Supreme Court of New Jersey, 1894)
Munger v. . Shannon
61 N.Y. 251 (New York Court of Appeals, 1874)
President of the Union Turnpike Road v. Jenkins
1 Cai. Cas. 381 (New York Supreme Court, 1803)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
4 Denio 159, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/worden-v-dodge-nysupct-1847.