Word v. Zambelli

58 A.D.3d 745, 870 N.Y.S.2d 798
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedJanuary 20, 2009
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 58 A.D.3d 745 (Word v. Zambelli) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Word v. Zambelli, 58 A.D.3d 745, 870 N.Y.S.2d 798 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2009).

Opinion

Proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 in the nature of mandamus to compel the re[746]*746spondent Barbara G. Zambelli, a Justice of the Supreme Court, Westchester County, to give “due process review” to the petitioner’s motion for leave to reargue and/or renew dated January 2, 2007, and motion for leave to renew dated May 7, 2007, and application by the petitioner to prosecute the proceeding as a poor person.

Ordered that the application to prosecute the proceeding as a poor person is granted to the extent that the filing fee imposed by CPLR 8022 (b) is waived, and the application is otherwise denied as academic; and it is further,

Adjudged that the petition is denied and the proceeding is dismissed on the merits, without costs or disbursements.

The extraordinary remedy of mandamus will lie only to compel the performance of a ministerial act and only when there exists a clear legal right to the relief sought (see Matter of Legal Aid Socy. of Sullivan County v Scheinman, 53 NY2d 12, 16 [1981]). The petitioner has failed to demonstrate a clear legal right to the relief sought. Fisher, J.E, Balkin, McCarthy and Leventhal, JJ, concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Matter of Murphy v. Menken
212 A.D.3d 626 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2023)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
58 A.D.3d 745, 870 N.Y.S.2d 798, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/word-v-zambelli-nyappdiv-2009.