Word v. Zambelli

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Word v. Zambelli

48 A.D.3d 825, 851 N.Y.S.2d 369

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedFebruary 26, 2008

StatusPublished

This text of 48 A.D.3d 825 (Word v. Zambelli) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Word v. Zambelli, 48 A.D.3d 825, 851 N.Y.S.2d 369 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2008).

Pincite

Opinion

Froceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78, inter alia, in the nature of mandamus to compel Barbara G. Zambelli, an Acting Justice of the Supreme Court, Westchester County, to issue a decision on the petitioner’s motion to reargue her petition to review a determination denying her request for a special diet, and application by the petitioner for poor person relief.

Ordered that the application for poor person relief is granted to the extent that the filing fee imposed by CPLR 8022 (b) is waived, and the application is otherwise denied; and it is further,

Adjudged that the petition is denied and the proceeding is dismissed as academic, without costs or disbursements.

The proceeding has been rendered academic by an order of the Supreme Court, Westchester County, dated January 16, 2008, which determined the petitioner’s motion to reargue. Lifson, J.P., Ritter, Angiolillo and Carni, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Froceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78, inter alia, in the nature of mandamus to compel Barbara G. Zambelli, an Acting Justice of the Supreme Court, Westchester County, to issue a decision on the petitioner’s motion to reargue her petition to review a determination denying her request for a special diet, and application by the petitioner for poor person relief.

Ordered that the application for poor person relief is granted to the extent that the filing fee imposed by CPLR 8022 (b) is waived, and the application is otherwise denied; and it is further,

Adjudged that the petition is denied and the proceeding is dismissed as academic, without costs or disbursements.

The proceeding has been rendered academic by an order of the Supreme Court, Westchester County, dated January 16, 2008, which determined the petitioner’s motion to reargue. Lifson, J.P., Ritter, Angiolillo and Carni, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

48 A.D.3d 825, 851 N.Y.S.2d 369, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/word-v-zambelli-nyappdiv-2008.