Word v. State
272 S.W.3d 488, 2008 Mo. App. LEXIS 1710, 2008 WL 5454128
Opinion
ORDER
Movant, Dexter Word, appeals from the judgment denying his Rule 24.035 motion after an evidentiary hearing. On appeal, movant argues that his pleas were not voluntarily, intelligently and knowingly made.
The motion court’s findings and conclusions are not clearly erroneous. Rule 24.035(k). An extended opinion would have no precedential value. The parties have been provided with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the reasons for this decision. The judgment is affirmed. Rule 84.16(b).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Word v. State, 272 S.W.3d 488, 2008 Mo. App. LEXIS 1710, 2008 WL 5454128 (Mo. Ct. App. 2008).
272 S.W.3d 488 (Word v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
State Ex Rel. Nixon v. Wilson
272 S.W.3d 488 (Missouri Court of Appeals, 2008)