Worcester Royal Porcelain Co. v. United States

U.S. Customs Court

Worcester Royal Porcelain Co. v. United States

32 Cust. Ct. 432, 1954 Cust. Ct. LEXIS 1915

United States Customs Court·Decided March 18, 1954·No. No. 57935; protests 195316-K, etc. (New York)·Published

Opinion

Opinion by

Johnson, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that certain items appearing on schedule B, attached to and made a part of the decision in this case, consist of china figures similar in all material respects to those passed upon in Wm. S. Pitcairn Corp. v. United States (39 C. C. P. A. 15, C. A. D. 458), the merchandise was held dutiable at 20 percent under paragraph 1547 (a), or at 10 percent under said paragraph, as modified by the Annecy Protocol to the General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade (T. D. 52373), supplemented by Presidential proclamation (T. D. 52476), effective May 28, 1950.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Opinion by

Johnson, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that certain items appearing on schedule B, attached to and made a part of the decision in this case, consist of china figures similar in all material respects to those passed upon in Wm. S. Pitcairn Corp. v. United States (39 C. C. P. A. 15, C. A. D. 458), the merchandise was held dutiable at 20 percent under paragraph 1547 (a), or at 10 percent under said paragraph, as modified by the Annecy Protocol to the General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade (T. D. 52373), supplemented by Presidential proclamation (T. D. 52476), effective May 28, 1950.

Worcester Royal Porcelain Co. v. United States, 32 Cust. Ct. 432, 1954 Cust. Ct. LEXIS 1915 (cusc 1954).

Pincite

32 Cust. Ct. 432 (Worcester Royal Porcelain Co. v. United States) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.