Worcester Insurance v. Sauro
This text of 251 A.D.2d 509 (Worcester Insurance v. Sauro) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
—In a proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 75 to permanently stay arbitration of an uninsured motorist claim, Anthony Sauro and Christine Sauro appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Westchester County (DiBlasi, J.), dated June 2, 1997, which granted the petitioner’s application.
Ordered that the order is affirmed, with costs.
The Supreme Court properly granted the petitioner’s application to permanently stay arbitration in this matter. The appellants, Anthony Sauro and Christine Sauro, waived their right to arbitrate the issue of their entitlement to damages under the uninsured motorist coverage in their policy with the petitioner by commencing an action sounding in breach of contract (see, Sherrill v Grayco Bldrs., 64 NY2d 261, 273; De Sapio v Kohlmeyer, 35 NY2d 402, 405). The action commenced by the Sauros did not concern claims separate from those they sought to arbitrate, nor was their action commenced merely to preserve the status quo (see, Sherrill v Grayco Bldrs., supra, at 273; Preiss/Breismeister Architects v Westin Hotel Co. Plaza Hotel Div., 56 NY2d 787, 789). O’Brien, J. P., Sullivan, Pizzuto and Joy, JJ., concur.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
251 A.D.2d 509, 673 N.Y.S.2d 590, 1998 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 6864, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/worcester-insurance-v-sauro-nyappdiv-1998.