Wootton v. Matheson

439 So. 2d 1007, 1983 Fla. App. LEXIS 22755
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedOctober 27, 1983
DocketNo. 83-88
StatusPublished

This text of 439 So. 2d 1007 (Wootton v. Matheson) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Wootton v. Matheson, 439 So. 2d 1007, 1983 Fla. App. LEXIS 22755 (Fla. Ct. App. 1983).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Under the circumstances of this case we find no abuse in the exercise of the equitable discretion of the trial judge in denying acceleration and foreclosure and attorney’s [1008]*1008fees. Obviously the trial judge concluded that the security for the mortgage indebtedness had not been impaired or put in jeopardy and that acceleration and foreclosure would be unconscionable in this instance. See Brady v. Edgar, 415 So.2d 141 (Fla. 5th DCA 1982), and Consol. Credit Properties v. National Bank, 420 So.2d 618 (Fla. 5th DCA 1982).

AFFIRMED.

COBB, FRANK D. UPCHURCH, Jr. and COWART, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Brady v. Edgar
415 So. 2d 141 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1982)
Consolidated Capital Properties, II, Ltd. v. National Bank of North America
420 So. 2d 618 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1982)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
439 So. 2d 1007, 1983 Fla. App. LEXIS 22755, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/wootton-v-matheson-fladistctapp-1983.